• Home
  • About
    • About Modern Stoicism
    • What is Stoicism?
    • The Team
  • Courses
    • Stoic Week
    • Stoic Week for Schools
    • Beyond Stoic Week
    • Mindfulness and Resilience
  • Events
    • Stoicon
    • Stoicon x
    • Events Calendar
    • Stoic Arts Conference
  • Articles
    • Stoicism Today articles
    • About Stoicism Today
    • Writing for Stoicism Today
    • Stoicism Today books
  • Research
  • Contact us
    • Get in touch
    • Media Enquiries
  • Donate
  • Become a patron
  • Home
  • About
    • About us
    • What is Stoicism
    • About Stoicism Today
    • The Team
  • Courses
    • Stoic week
    • Stoic Week for Schools
    • Beyond Stoic Week
    • Mindfulness and Resilience
  • Events
    • Stoicon
    • Stoicon x events
  • Articles
    • Stoicism Today blog
    • Writing for Stoicism Today
    • Stoicism Today: Selected Essays – The Books
  • Research
  • Contact us
    • Contact
    • Media Enquiries
  • Donate
  • Become a patron

A Facebook Chat with Seneca

| Posted: on July 9 2014 | 0 Comment

Few people know this, but the Ancient Stoics are all over social media. Marcus tweets. Chrysippus cranks it out over on reddit. Rufus keeps getting banned from G+ groups. Seneca is a Facebook guy, so I hit him up for some parenting advice.

Me: Dude, you around? Seneca: Greetings from Seneca to his Facebook friend Ben. Me: Yeah, hey! What’s up? Seneca: Acting thus. Me: Cool, cool. Kids are pissing me off though. Seneca: You are right to fear anger. It is the most hideous and wild passion. Banish it completely. It does nothing good. No plague has cost the human race more dearly. Me: Well, hey, I’m just trying to cool off a little. Sometimes you need to get angry, right? Like sometimes I need to punish my kids for their own good… Seneca: Correction is sometimes necessary, but with discretion, not anger. Me: But we’ve gotta get angry sometimes, right? I mean, if we have to fight someone in a war or whatever.

Seneca: I have written a letter about this to No_Vat_Us. Do you not have Google? You puzzle me, friend. You ask for help in banishing your anger and then argue to defend it. You must be mistaking me for @GoldenMean.   Me: Okay, you’re right, forget that for now. Here’s the real problem. I blow up at my kids. Like way too much over the stupidest stuff. I’m trying to do some work and they just keep asking for stuff and I fly off the handle. How do I stop?  Seneca: The best course is to reject at once the first incitement to anger, to resist even its small beginnings. The enemy must be stopped at the very frontier; for if he has passed it, and advanced within the city gates, he will not respect any bounds. Me: Mmmkay, how? Seneca: Anger does not spring up out of nowhere. It arises in your mind. Anger is aroused by the direct impression of an injury. Me: Okay, that makes sense. I’m sitting here writing a blog post or whatever and my kids ask me for something and I think it’s not fair. I deserve to have some time work on this. They’re not being fair. But the thing is, this all just happens automatically. Emotions just spring up on their own, right?

Seneca: The first stirrings of emotion arise automatically, yes, but not the destructive passion of anger you speak of. Me: So the emotion is automatic, but the passion is something I can control then? Seneca: That you may know, further, how the passions begin, grow, and run riot, I may say that the first prompting is involuntary, a preparation for passion, as it were, and a sort of menace. The next is combined with an act of the will, although not an unruly one, which assumes that it is right for you to be angry with your children for interrupting your work--or that it is right for your children to be punished because they have done something wrong. The third prompting is now beyond control, in that it wishes to take vengeance, not if it is right to do so, but whether or no, and has utterly vanquished reason. Me: Okay, so let me see if I get this. These destructive passions arise in three parts. The first part is involuntary. Nothing I can do about it. The second part is where I have a choice whether or not I agree with it. If it gets to the third part, then I’m just off the rails? Seneca: Just so. Me: I don’t feel like that second part ever happens, though. I feel like the whole thing is involuntary. I just jump from the first impression to losing my shit. Seneca: It is because of habit that it seems so. Learn the new habit of being continually mindful and you will come to experience the second movement. It is there that you have the choice to counter that impression by imagining how someone you admire might react in the same situation. Me: Couldn’t I also just observe the first impression and let it pass away without trying to push it away or argue with it?  Seneca: Yes. This is called suspending judgment. Me: Okay, I’ll try that. Thanks for the advice. Seneca: Farewell!

Ben Butina blogs at approximatelyforever.com.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Discover more from Modern Stoicism

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

← Fatherhood & Stoic Acceptance – Jan Fredrik-Braseth
New Series Tomorrow →
| Posted: on July 9 2014 | 0 Comment

Tags

Tags

adapting stoicism audio Australia character community Conference death dichotomy of control Enchiridion 3 Epictetus Event events German Interview introspection living like a Stoic Marcus Aurelius meditation Military mindfulness Misunderstandings Nature Philosophy Philosophy or life hacks poetry poll psychotherapy real life examples relationship resilience self-help Seneca Stoic stoic exercises Stoicism Stoicon stoicon-x Stoic philosophy stoic practices Stoic Week Stoic Week 2014 The Sage video view from above virtue

Comments are closed.

Other articles from Stoicism Today

Review of William O. Stephens’ Marcus Aurelius: Philosopher-King — by Judith Stove

Sat, 06 Dec 2025 Brittany Polat

... Read more

“It’s all very well in practice, but will it work in theory?”  A Counter-Response to Massimo Pigliucci — by Chuck Chakrapani

Sat, 29 Nov 2025 Brittany Polat

... Read more

See all recent articles

Subscribe to Stoicism Today

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 42,413 other subscribers

Loading
  • Home
  • About us
  • Stoic Week
  • Mindfulness & Resilience
  • Stoicon
  • Stoicon x
  • Research
  • Contact us
  • Comments Policy
  • Donate
  • Become a patron
  • Media enquiries

Discover more from Modern Stoicism

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

%d